The Possession -2012-2012 May 2026

The film’s greatest weakness is its resolution. After the exorcism, the family simply reunites; there is no exploration of the underlying marital issues. The dybbuk is destroyed, but the conditions that attracted it (dishonesty, anger, fractured communication) remain unaddressed. This optimistic ending conflicts with the film’s otherwise grim realism, suggesting that the supernatural threat was always a more comfortable enemy than marital therapy.

The central artifact—the dybbuk box (based on the real “Dibbuk Box” sold on eBay in 2003)—serves as a powerful material metaphor. In the film, Clyde and Stephanie have divided their household: Clyde keeps a new apartment; Stephanie retains the family home. The box is discovered at a yard sale, a liminal space of discarded possessions and broken transactions. Emily, the middle child caught in the custody crossfire, is drawn to the box because it promises secrecy and containment—qualities her life lacks. The Possession -2012-2012

Upon release, The Possession received mixed to positive reviews (49% on Rotten Tomatoes, with a 57 Metacritic score). Critics praised Natascha Calis’s physical performance but faulted the film’s reliance on jump scares and a slow middle act. However, retrospective analyses (e.g., Bloody Disgusting’s 2022 re-evaluation) have noted the film’s prescient treatment of divorce-related childhood anxiety. In an era of elevated horror, The Possession is often dismissed as a minor work, yet its direct engagement with custody trauma—specifically the child as a “vessel” for parental anger—anticipates Ari Aster’s Hereditary (2018) by six years. The film’s greatest weakness is its resolution

Ole Bornedal’s The Possession (2012) distinguishes itself from the glut of post- The Exorcist possession narratives by grounding its supernatural horror in the specific Jewish folklore of the dybbuk . This paper argues that the film functions as a layered allegory for familial disintegration in contemporary America. While marketed as a mainstream horror film, The Possession uses its demonic entity—a malicious, disembodied spirit trapped in a antique box—as a literal manifestation of unresolved trauma, specifically the anger and grief stemming from divorce. By examining the film’s use of cultural authenticity (via consultant Rabbi Yitzchak Wyne), its suburban setting, and the gender dynamics of possession, this analysis will demonstrate that the film’s true horror lies not in the paranormal but in the failure of communication and the paternal anxieties of shared custody. This optimistic ending conflicts with the film’s otherwise

A controversial aspect of The Possession is its use of Orthodox Jewish ritual as a source of horror and salvation. The film employs Rabbi Wyne as a consultant, lending authenticity to the exorcism scene (which includes the blowing of a shofar , recitation of Psalm 91, and the burning of a white candle). However, the film also participates in a problematic trope: the “ethnic expert” who must rescue the ignorant white Protestant family. Clyde, a non-practicing Christian, must submit to Hasidic authority—a narrative that reinforces the exoticism of Jewish mysticism for mainstream audiences.

Nevertheless, this dynamic serves the divorce allegory. The gerush exorcism requires the entire family to be present and to confess their sins against one another. In a key scene, Tzadok forces Clyde to admit that he was unfaithful (the implied cause of the divorce) while the dybbuk speaks through Emily. The exorcism succeeds not through holy water or crucifixes but through the restoration of familial unity and truth-telling. The dybbuk is expelled only when the parents stop fighting and hold Emily together—a literal act of shared custody. The horror concludes when the family, broken but reunited, watches the box burn. The message is clear: the demon of divorce cannot be fought individually; it requires communal ritual and accountability.