Soekarno Film 2013 -

★★★½ (3.5/5) Recommended for: Students of Southeast Asian history, lovers of political oratory, and those who believe that a single man’s voice can indeed change the world.

However, the film’s greatest weakness is its compression of time. To fit a decade of revolution into two and a half hours, history becomes a montage. The bloody battle of Surabaya (later depicted in a different film, Battle of Surabaya ) is reduced to a single heroic tableau. The complex negotiations with the Japanese are simplified into a matter of personal charisma. To write deeply about Soekarno (2013) is to acknowledge its silence. This is a film produced under the watchful eye of a post-Suharto Indonesia that is still sensitive about the 1965 coup and the subsequent mass killings. The film ends triumphantly with the Proclamation. It does not show the later years: the Guided Democracy, the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly, the Nasakom contradictions, or the slide into authoritarianism. soekarno film 2013

The film is flawed. It is too long, occasionally melodramatic, and historically incomplete. Non-Indonesian audiences may struggle with the dense socio-political jargon. Yet, as a piece of national myth-making, it is a masterpiece of intention . It successfully captures the feeling of merdeka (freedom)—the dizzying, terrifying, euphoric moment when a colonized people decide to become a nation. ★★★½ (3