Saeed | Pegahan

His writings and interviews, smuggled out and published by solidarity committees in Europe, articulate a vision of a secular, democratic Iran where workers have the right to strike, organize, and bargain collectively without fear of the gallows. This vision directly challenges the foundation of the Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist), which subordinates all social institutions to clerical authority.

As of 2025, Saeed Pegahan remains imprisoned, though his health is precarious. Periodic reports suggest he has been moved between wards of Evin Prison, occasionally granted furloughs due to international pressure, only to be returned to his cell. His comrade, Rasul Bodaghi, remains imprisoned as well. saeed pegahan

In the tumultuous landscape of modern Iranian history, where state security and political repression have often overshadowed the voices of the marginalized, few figures embody the spirit of peaceful resistance as profoundly as Saeed Pegahan. A labor activist, political prisoner, and symbol of the struggle for workers’ rights, Pegahan’s life story is not merely a biography of an individual but a testament to the broader, often brutal confrontation between Iran’s civil society and its theocratic state apparatus. His journey from a bus driver in Tehran to a convicted “enemy of God” ( mohareb ) highlights the Islamic Republic’s deep-seated fear of independent labor organizing and its systematic criminalization of dissent. His writings and interviews, smuggled out and published

Because of the draconian nature of his sentence for non-violent labor activism, Pegahan has become a central figure in international campaigns against Iran’s human rights record. Organizations like Amnesty International have adopted him as a prisoner of conscience, arguing that he has used no violence and that his only “crime” is advocating for the rights of workers. Periodic reports suggest he has been moved between

In Iran, labor unions are either state-controlled through the Islamic Labour Councils or effectively banned. Any attempt to form an independent collective is viewed through the lens of national security. Pegahan, however, refused to accept this reality. Alongside fellow activist Rasul Bodaghi, he co-founded the Tehran Bus Drivers’ Syndicate in the early 2000s. This was not a political party seeking to overthrow the regime; it was a grassroots organization demanding basic economic dignity. Yet, in the Islamic Republic, the distinction between economic justice and political subversion is often deliberately erased.

The response was swift and violent. Plainclothes officers of the Ministry of Intelligence and the paramilitary Basij militia arrested Pegahan and his colleagues. He was not charged with violating labor codes; he was charged with national security offenses. After a closed-door trial widely condemned by international human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, Pegahan was convicted of “moharebeh” (enmity against God) and “assembly and collusion against national security.” He was sentenced to death, later commuted to a long prison term—initially 14 years, then extended to 19 years, plus additional sentences for “propaganda against the system.”

Saeed Pegahan’s significance lies in his ideological clarity. Unlike the Green Movement of 2009, which was largely driven by the middle class and reformist elites, Pegahan’s struggle is rooted in classical class analysis. He has repeatedly stated that political freedom is meaningless without economic justice. In a country where inflation and unemployment cripple millions, he argues that the theocracy’s legitimacy depends on its ability to provide for the poor—and that by failing to do so, it has forfeited that legitimacy.