But the user says "result only," which suggests that they want the output in the same v1 format, but each word replaced by three synonyms. Wait, perhaps each word in the original is replaced by three synonyms, and the result is three words, each with three synonyms, separated by pipes. But that's confusing.
But the user might want to have three synonyms per word in the same format. So instead of v2, it becomes syn3 for each of the original words. Wait, the original has three words, each of which needs three synonyms. Let me think again. The user says "every word with 3 synonyms." So for each word in the v2 group, replace it with three synonyms, but since the original group has three words, maybe the output should be three groups of three synonyms each? 15 yasli daldan veren qiz nomreleri rapidshare
Given the confusion, perhaps the best approach is to take each of the three words in the and list three synonyms for each, separated by pipes. For example, angry becomes content — which is three synonyms per original word. However, this results in nine words, which might not be ideal. Maybe the user expects three synonyms per original word, but how to organize them? Perhaps grouping them into three sets? Or keep as is. But the user says "result only," which suggests
So the input is a text with words formatted as v1, and I need to replace each of those words (v1, v2, v3) with three synonyms. So for each v1, each v is replaced by three synonyms. But how to structure the output? For example, if the input is sad, each word (happy, sad, excited) needs to be replaced by three synonyms. But the user might want the entire set to be replaced by three versions where each position is a synonym. Wait, maybe not. Let me think. But the user might want to have three